lapidarius: (when all are one and one is all)
Kakyoin Noriaki | 花京院典明 ([personal profile] lapidarius) wrote2020-12-27 01:21 pm

[community profile] rubycity_rp ic inbox | II



"This is Kakyoin Noriaki. Please leave a message, I'll contact you as soon as I can."

● ⇨
starmark: (PROUD ☆ my daughter's such a badass)

[personal profile] starmark 2016-07-18 05:11 am (UTC)(link)
no i'm saying that's how long the arcade is worth

until you run out of air

that's how long
starmark: (NOSE ☆ not it not it i call not it)

[personal profile] starmark 2016-07-18 05:15 am (UTC)(link)
no no

i get to breathe

you don't
whatitis: (cecil please i'm serious)

sssometime after 7/19 time is fake

[personal profile] whatitis 2016-07-24 12:48 am (UTC)(link)
hi: it's carlos

can you vouch for me to fugo. he's really rude i just want to do science and he's impeding my investigations
whatitis: (sweat)

[personal profile] whatitis 2016-07-24 01:08 am (UTC)(link)
i was like "can i look at purple haze" and he was like "who told you this thing" and i was like "kakyoin" and he was like "UGH" anyways he won't let me examine purple haze for scientific purposes so please tell him that i am a professional scientist

also i was right

giorno named his stand after a gosh darn prince album
whatitis: (Default)

[personal profile] whatitis 2016-07-24 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
but why not :^(
whatitis: (love)

[personal profile] whatitis 2016-07-24 01:21 am (UTC)(link)
okay but can you put in a good word

like

gee, that carlos, what a respectable and trustworthy scientist

have you talked to carlos lately? isn't he handsome and very devoted to his work?

if you need help for anything, go to carlos. he can handle any situation, even murder stands.
whatitis: (:0)

[personal profile] whatitis 2016-07-24 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
but it IS a desire for information. i want to know more about this subject, and he has information about it. you can't argue with science and logic and facts and numbers.
whatitis: (you've startled him)

[personal profile] whatitis 2016-07-24 02:18 am (UTC)(link)
i AM respecting that. logically, though, he should have very little reason to refuse

but i guess logic doesn't apply to things like this or people like him, and i respect that too. if he doesn't want to talk i won't push him to talk

that being said

i am right.
whatitis: (neutral)

[personal profile] whatitis 2016-07-24 02:27 am (UTC)(link)
me being right doesn't mean he's not right, it just means that we're both on different tracks. my goal is to get us on the same track and therefore to the same (correct!) conclusion

people like him think with their emotions, which is good and fine, but they usually don't think the way i think, which makes things like this harder
whatitis: (cecil please i'm serious)

[personal profile] whatitis 2016-07-24 02:39 am (UTC)(link)
okay but

yeah it is

it's for the good of scientific advancement which can only mean it's right, obviously.
whatitis: (:D!)

[personal profile] whatitis 2016-07-24 02:55 am (UTC)(link)
i'm not trivializing anything. there's zero risk posed to him or me or ANYONE else during this study, and so it makes the most rational sense for him to agree, right? i understand why he might be reluctant, but the information is confidential, and, like i said, there's no threat to anyone's safety in any way. it just seems kind of silly to prolong things like this when we could be getting so much more work done
whatitis: (worry)

[personal profile] whatitis 2016-07-24 03:19 am (UTC)(link)
i am not pushing anyone.

[There is absolutely nothing from his end for a couple of minutes, then:]

i understand that you all have your own lives, and i have never once wavered on that fact. i respect boundaries to the best of my ability, and i do not consider it "pushing" if i simply acknowledge the fact that i'm right. he still has the right to his own decision, just like you did, but i am allowed to express my opinions on any hypothetical decision he has. it's not pushing if it doesn't affect him.

Page 10 of 45